Conceptual Properties of Islamic Economic Modeling: Complexity, Nonlinearity, and Endogeneity in Epistemological Perspectives

  • Masudul Alam Choudhury (Rtd.) School of Business Cape Breton University Sydney, Nova Scotia, Canada
Keywords: Islamic Economics, Complexity, Non-Linearity, Dynamic Modeling, Epistemology of Qur’anic Monotheistic Law of Unity of Knowledge

Abstract

This paper introduces a new perspective of economic reasoning and analysis pertaining to situations of complexity combined with nonlinearity and endogenous relations among interacting, integrating and evolutionary entities. The entities comprise multi-variables representing different embedded systems that encompass economy, society, science, and ethics. In the emergent model of endogenous inter-causal relationships between such entities the ontological perspective assumes the nature of evaluating inter-causal intra- and inters- systemic relations by means of formalism belonging to functional ontology of mathematical forms (Gruber, 1993), as opposed to invoking metaphysical ontological speculation. The functional ontological approach to structure and formalize leads to a new framework of economic reasoning in the presence of embedded systems that continuously participate and complement, as opposed to being subjected to the central postulate of marginal rate of substitution and exogenous treatment of knowledge in mainstream economics. The continuous phenomenon of interaction, integration, and evolutionary (IIE) learning in such inter-causal systems establish ethical endogeneity. Thus, philosophical background of economic reasoning is invoked in the functional epistemological formalism of the interactive, integrative, and evolutionary systems. That is sush systems are characterized by IIE-learning processes induced by the episteme of unity of knowledge.

References

Barrow, J. D. (1991). Theories of Everything: The Quest for Ultimate Explanation (Vol. 61). Oxford, Eng: Oxford University Press.

Beed, C., & Kane, O. (1991). What Is the Critique of the Mathematization of Economics? Kyklos, 44(4), 581–612. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6435.1991.tb01798.x

Bertuglia, C. S., & Vaio, F. (2005). Dynamical systems and the phase space. In Nonlinearity, Chaos, and Complexity (pp. 49–59). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198567905.003.0008

Boland, L. A. (1990). The methodology of economic model building. Journal of Macroeconomics, 12(2), 336. https://doi.org/10.1016/0164-0704(90)90047-E

Chichilnisky, G. (1990). Topology and Economics: The Contribution of S. Smale (M. W. Hirsch, J. E. Marsden, & M. Shub, Eds.). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.

Choudhury, M. A. (2007). The Universal Paradigm and the Islamic World-System. World Scientific. https://doi.org/10.1142/6344

Choudhury, M. A. (2009). Which of the two ? - Knowledge or time. Philosophical Papers and Review, 1(4), 6–16.

Debreu, G. (1990). Stephen Smale and the Economic Theory of General Equilibrium. In M. W. Hirsch, J. E. Marsden, & M. Shub (Eds.), From Topology to Computation: Proceedings of the Smalefest (pp. 131-146.). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.

Gelfand, I. M. (1961). Lectures on Linear Algebra. Gelfand. Interscience.

George, H. (1897). The Science of Political Economy. In Political Science Quarterly (Vol. 13). New York: : Robert Schalkenbach Foundation.

Gruber, T. R. (1993). A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge Acquisition, 5(2), 199–220. https://doi.org/10.1006/knac.1993.1008

Hawking, S. W. (1988). Space and time”. In his Brief History of Time. New York, NY: Bantam Books.

Hubner, K. (1985). Foundations of a universal historistic theory of the empirical sciences in his Critique of Scientific Reason (P. R. Dixon & H. M. Dixon, Trans.). Chicago, ILL: The University of Chicago Press.

Kupka, I. A. K., & Peixoto, M. M. (1993). On the enumerative geometry of geodesics. From Topology to Computation: Proceedings of the Smalefest, 243–253. Springer.

Prigogine, I. (1980). From Being to Becoming. San Francisco: CA: W.H. Freeman.

Primavesi, A. (2000). Sacred Gaia. London: Eng: Routledge.

Smale, S. (1990). The story of the higher dimensional poincaré conjecture (what actually happened on the beaches of rio). The Mathematical Intelligencer, 12(2), 44–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03024004

Soros, G. (1998). Fallibility and reflexivity”, in The Crisis of Global Capitalism. New York: Public Affairs.

Sztompka, P. (1974). Systemic models in functional analysis”. In System and Function, Towards a Theory of Society (pp. 47–57). New York, NY: Academic Press.

Sztompka, P. (1991). Society in action: The theory of social becoming. University of Chicago Press.

Thayer-Bacon, B. (2003). Why ‘(e)pistemology?” in her Relational (e)pistemologies. New York: Peter Lang.

Whitehead, A. N. (1978). Process and Reality (Vol. 6; D. R. Griffin & D. W. Sherburne, Eds.). New York, NY: Free Press. https://doi.org/10.5840/schoolman19306337

Xuemou, W., & Dinghe, G. (1999). Pansystems cybernetics: Framework, methodology and development. Kybernetes, 28(6–7), 679–694. https://doi.org/10.1108/03684929910282953

Published
2024-06-30
How to Cite
Choudhury, M. A. (2024). Conceptual Properties of Islamic Economic Modeling: Complexity, Nonlinearity, and Endogeneity in Epistemological Perspectives. Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Islam, 6(1), 30-36. https://doi.org/10.24239/jiebi.v6i1.266.30-36
Section
Articles